We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience.
This includes personalizing content and advertising.
By pressing "Accept All" or closing out of this banner, you consent to the use of all cookies and similar technologies and the sharing of information they collect with third parties.
You can reject marketing cookies by pressing "Deny Optional," but we still use essential, performance, and functional cookies.
In addition, whether you "Accept All," Deny Optional," click the X or otherwise continue to use the site, you accept our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service, revised from time to time.
You are being directed to ZacksTrade, a division of LBMZ Securities and licensed broker-dealer. ZacksTrade and Zacks.com are separate companies. The web link between the two companies is not a solicitation or offer to invest in a particular security or type of security. ZacksTrade does not endorse or adopt any particular investment strategy, any analyst opinion/rating/report or any approach to evaluating individual securities.
If you wish to go to ZacksTrade, click OK. If you do not, click Cancel.
Shell Falls Short in LNG Arbitration Against Venture Global
Read MoreHide Full Article
Key Takeaways
SHEL lost arbitration to Venture Global over LNG contract disputes during soaring prices.
Tribunal sided with Venture Global, citing commissioning phase exemptions from obligations.
Ruling may set precedent, prompting tighter terms in future LNG supply agreements.
Shell plc (SHEL - Free Report) recently lost a legal arbitration claim over liquefied natural gas (“LNG”) supply disputes as the ruling prevailed in favor of U.S. LNG operator Venture Global, Inc. (VG - Free Report) , defeating the former’s claim that the latter had breached contracts to profit from higher spot market prices.
The case is one of several initiated in 2023 by customers of Venture Global, including major energy giants like Shell, BP p.l.c. (BP - Free Report) , Sinopec and Galp Energia, SGPS, S.A. (GLPEY - Free Report) , alleging that Venture Global withheld contracted LNG cargoes during a period of soaring prices after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.
London-based oil supermajor Shell is one of the energy multinationals with operations that span almost every corner of the globe. Shell’s long-term strategy revolves around LNG, considering the likely significant demand rise in the near-to-medium term. The company, along with other industry heavyweights BP and GLPEY, recently got entangled in a high-profile public clash against Venture Global and filed damages claims ranging from $6.7 billion to $7.4 billion against the LNG supplier and pursued arbitration through the International Chamber of Commerce.
Dispute Over Contractual Obligations
At the heart of the dispute was whether Venture Global’s Calcasieu Pass facility in Louisiana had reached commercial operations when it sold LNG cargoes on the spot market. Venture Global argued it was not obligated to deliver under long-term contracts during the commissioning phase, on the grounds that the facility’s power supply equipment needed repair.
However, the major oil companies like BP, Shell, Sinopec, Galp, Repsol and Edison, in the capacity of customer, argued that their client, Venture Global, had sold many cargoes even before Calcasieu Pass officially began full commercial operations in April 2025.
Shell’s Response and Industry Concerns
While respecting the tribunal’s ruling, Shell expressed disappointment, emphasizing that trust in long-term contracts underpins LNG investment and sustainable growth. The outcome has sparked broader industry debate about balancing operational flexibility with buyer confidence in supply commitments.
Wider Impact on the LNG Industry
The International Chamber of Commerce’s decision marks a significant financial win for Venture Global and could set a precedent for similar ongoing cases. Analysts note that foundation customers may now push for stricter contractual terms to protect future LNG-supply agreements.
See More Zacks Research for These Tickers
Normally $25 each - click below to receive one report FREE:
Image: Bigstock
Shell Falls Short in LNG Arbitration Against Venture Global
Key Takeaways
Shell plc (SHEL - Free Report) recently lost a legal arbitration claim over liquefied natural gas (“LNG”) supply disputes as the ruling prevailed in favor of U.S. LNG operator Venture Global, Inc. (VG - Free Report) , defeating the former’s claim that the latter had breached contracts to profit from higher spot market prices.
The case is one of several initiated in 2023 by customers of Venture Global, including major energy giants like Shell, BP p.l.c. (BP - Free Report) , Sinopec and Galp Energia, SGPS, S.A. (GLPEY - Free Report) , alleging that Venture Global withheld contracted LNG cargoes during a period of soaring prices after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.
London-based oil supermajor Shell is one of the energy multinationals with operations that span almost every corner of the globe. Shell’s long-term strategy revolves around LNG, considering the likely significant demand rise in the near-to-medium term. The company, along with other industry heavyweights BP and GLPEY, recently got entangled in a high-profile public clash against Venture Global and filed damages claims ranging from $6.7 billion to $7.4 billion against the LNG supplier and pursued arbitration through the International Chamber of Commerce.
Dispute Over Contractual Obligations
At the heart of the dispute was whether Venture Global’s Calcasieu Pass facility in Louisiana had reached commercial operations when it sold LNG cargoes on the spot market. Venture Global argued it was not obligated to deliver under long-term contracts during the commissioning phase, on the grounds that the facility’s power supply equipment needed repair.
However, the major oil companies like BP, Shell, Sinopec, Galp, Repsol and Edison, in the capacity of customer, argued that their client, Venture Global, had sold many cargoes even before Calcasieu Pass officially began full commercial operations in April 2025.
Shell’s Response and Industry Concerns
While respecting the tribunal’s ruling, Shell expressed disappointment, emphasizing that trust in long-term contracts underpins LNG investment and sustainable growth. The outcome has sparked broader industry debate about balancing operational flexibility with buyer confidence in supply commitments.
Wider Impact on the LNG Industry
The International Chamber of Commerce’s decision marks a significant financial win for Venture Global and could set a precedent for similar ongoing cases. Analysts note that foundation customers may now push for stricter contractual terms to protect future LNG-supply agreements.